| |
|
Overview
To support Israel was an
expiation, and many of us gave our hearts to the cause.
To question the wisdom of displacing the native Arabs
with foreign Jews was to play the game of the wicked
Grand Mufti. To feel sympathy with the million or so
Arabs refugees was to turn one’s back on the Six Million
who had died in Hitler’s fearful extermination pits. As
war followed war, and Israel waxed ever stronger, it was
always the Arabs’ fault and their sufferings were of
their own making.
Yet,
despite their fatal genius for putting themselves in the wrong,
the Arabs have a far more powerful case than most American
liberals care to admit. They have suffered wrongs that, under
ordinary circumstances would be considered cruel beyond belief.
In order for a Jewish state to be establish in Palestine, a
thousand year old Arab Palestine community was wiped out and
most of its residents scattered into squalid shanty towns of
hate and hopelessness. Because of the crimes of a Christian
nation in Europe, the people of the Near East had a catastrophe
visited upon them, and they have been repeatedly punished in
wars that they cannot seem to avoid precipitating.
Another Look
*
* * * *
Israel, without the United
States, would probably not exist. The country came perilously
close to extinction during the
October 1973 war when Egypt, trained and backed by the
Soviet Union, crossed the Suez and the Syrians poured in over
the Golan Heights. Huge American military transport planes came
to the rescue. They began landing every half-hour to refit the
battered Israeli army, which had lost most of its heavy armor.
By the time the war was over, the United States had given Israel
$2.2 billion in emergency military aid.
The intervention, which
enraged the Arab world, triggered the OPEC
oil embargo that for a time wreaked havoc on Western
economies. This was perhaps the most dramatic example of the
sustained life-support system the United States has provided to
the Jewish state. Israel was
born at midnight May 14, 1948. The U.S. recognized the new
state 11 minutes later. The two countries have been locked in a
deadly embrace ever since. Washington, at the beginning of the
relationship, was able to be a moderating influence.
An incensed President
Eisenhower demanded and got Israel’s withdrawal after the
Israelis occupied Gaza in 1956. During the Six-Day War in 1967,
Israeli warplanes bombed the
USS Liberty. The ship, flying the U.S. flag and stationed
15 miles off the Israeli coast, was intercepting tactical and
strategic communications from both sides. The Israeli strikes
killed 34 U.S. sailors and wounded 171. The deliberate attack
froze, for a while, Washington’s enthusiasm for Israel. But
ruptures like this one proved to be only bumps, soon smoothed
out by an increasingly sophisticated and well-financed Israel
lobby that set out to merge Israeli and American foreign policy
in the Middle East. . . .
U.S. foreign policy,
especially under the current Bush administration, has become
little more than an extension of Israeli foreign policy. The
United States since 1982 has vetoed 32 Security Council
resolutions critical of Israel, more than the total number of
vetoes cast by all the other Security Council members. It
refuses to enforce the Security Council resolutions it claims to
support. These resolutions call on Israel to withdraw from the
occupied territories. Chris
Hedges
A Declaration of Independence From Israel Truthdig
*
* * * *
End
of the Jewish experiment in the Middle East.
The weakening
of the United States, economically and militarily,
is giving rise to new centers of power. The U.S.
economy, mismanaged and drained by the Iraq war, is
increasingly dependent on Chinese trade imports and
on Chinese holdings of U.S. Treasury securities.
China holds dollar reserves worth $825 billion. If
Beijing decides to abandon the U.S. bond market,
even in part, it would cause a free fall by the
dollar. It would lead to the collapse of the
$7-trillion U.S. real estate market. There would be
a wave of U.S. bank failures and huge unemployment.
The growing dependence on China has been accompanied
by aggressive work by the Chinese to build alliances
with many of the world’s major exporters of oil,
such as Iran, Nigeria, Sudan, and Venezuela. The
Chinese are preparing for the looming worldwide
clash over dwindling resources. The future is
ominous. Not only do Israel’s foreign policy
objectives not coincide with American interests,
they actively hurt them. The growing belligerence
in the Middle East, the calls for an attack against
Iran, the collapse of the imperial project in Iraq
have all given an opening, where there was none
before, to America’s rivals. It is not in Israel’s
interests to ignite a regional conflict. It is not
in ours. But those who have their hands on the
wheel seem determined, in the name of freedom and
democracy, to keep the American ship of state headed
at breakneck speed into the cliffs before us.
Chris
Hedges
A Declaration of Independence From Israel
Truthdig
*
* * * *
|
|
If the war ends with
Hamas still standing, bloodied but unvanquished, in
face of the mighty Israeli military machine,
it will look like
a fantastic victory, a victory of mind over matter.
Uri Avnery
After 22 days of war against
Hamas, and the deaths of more than 1,200
Palestinians and 13 Israelis [over 5,000 Gazans
injured]
Prime Minister
Ehud Olmert insisted that “we have reached all
the goals of the war, and beyond.”
NYTimes
Hamas said on Sunday it would
cease fire immediately . . . and give Israel . . . a
week to pull its troops out of the territory.
NYTimes
The overwhelming number of high
elected officials in this country fear the Israeli
lobby and tremble at the thought of being labeled as
an anti-Semite for being in the slightest bit
critical of Israel . . .—Dennis
Bernstein, Israels
attack on an entrapped population: A 21st century
war crime?
Israel has imprinted on world
consciousness a terrible image of itself. Billions
of people have seen us as a blood-dripping monster.
Uri Avnery
Mapping an Occupation--WestBank
*
* * * *
Gazans Struggle for Clean Drinking Water—At the
end of February the UN Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA)
assessed that over 2,000 families needed their homes to
be rebuilt, while nearly 11,000 families required urgent
repairs to their homes. The agency said it expected the
figures to rise.
Six Palestinian Authority (PA) schools in northern Gaza
were also severely damaged, forcing nearly 5,000 school
children to relocate to other schools. The overcrowding
meant that additional double-shifts were introduced,
further burdening the 351 schools, approximately half of
which already run double-shifts.
Meanwhile, Gaza's hospitals are struggling because
equipment such as neonatal machines lack spare parts,
while some medicines are not available. Furthermore,
only half of more than 300 Gazans who wanted to travel
abroad for emergency medical treatment succeeded in
getting permits from Israel.
Malnutrition is another growing problem, and children
and pregnant women bear the brunt. UNICEF recently
provided vitamin supplements to 50,000 babies and
children under five.
The OCHA says that the 127 truckloads of daily aid
permitted in by the Israeli authorities is insufficient
to meet market needs. Prior to the blockade 475 trucks
entered daily.
Poverty and unemployment plague Gaza following Israel's
destruction of various sectors which provided
employment.
The Private Sector Coordination Council (PSCC) assesses
that 700 private sector establishments were either
completely destroyed or damaged. The damage is valued at
140 million dollars.
The UN Development Programme (UNDP), the Food and
Agriculture Organisation (FAO) and the Palestinian
Ministry of Agriculture estimate that 180 million
dollars worth of damage was done to agricultural
infrastructure.
The fishing sector was estimated to have suffered direct
and indirect losses of 2.2 million dollars, due to
destruction of fishing boats and related materials. And
even those who are employed and earning are struggling.
According to the International Monetary Fund (IMF),
Israeli restrictions on the entry of cash into Gaza has
affected the livelihoods of up to half a million Gazans,
in a population of 1.5 million. (END/2009)
IPSNews
*
* * * *
|
Israel accused of indiscriminate phosphorus use in Gaza—Israel's
military fired white phosphorus over crowded areas of Gaza
repeatedly and indiscriminately in its three-week war, killing and
injuring civilians and committing war crimes, Human Rights Watch
said today. . . . "In Gaza, the Israeli military didn't just use
white phosphorus in open areas as a screen for its troops," said
Fred Abrahams, a senior Human Rights Watch researcher. "It fired
white phosphorus repeatedly over densely populated areas, even when
its troops weren't in the area and safe smoke shells were available.
As a result, civilians needlessly suffered and died." He said senior
commanders should be held to account. . . . White phosphorus burns
in contact with oxygen and causes deep burns when it touches human
skin, sometimes reaching to the bone.
Guardian (25 March 2009) |
 |
*
* * * *
 |
Ariel
Sharon, Israeli PM
Making Peace in Palestine
<---Some Photo Samples of His
Work--->
May, 19, 2004 |
 |
*
* * * *
*
* * * *
|
What credibility is there in Geneva's all-white boycott?—What
do the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the
Netherlands, Germany, Poland, Italy and Israel have in
common? They are all either European or European-settler
states. And they
all decided to boycott this week's UN conference
against racism in Geneva – even before Monday's
incendiary speech by the Iranian president Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad which triggered a further white-flight
walkout by representatives of another 23 European
states. In international forums, it's almost
unprecedented to have such an undiluted racial divide
of whites-versus-the-rest. And for that to happen in a
global meeting called to combat racial hatred doesn't
exactly augur well for future international
understanding at a time when the worst economic crisis
since the war is ramping up racism and xenophobia across
the world. . . .The dispute was mainly about Israel and
western fears that the conference would be used, like
its torrid predecessor in Durban at the height of the
Palestinian intifada in 2001, to denounce the Jewish
state and attack the west over colonialism and the slave
trade.
Guardian
|
 |
*
* * * *
updated 4 June 2008 |
|
|