|
Books by
Rose Ure Mezu
Women
in Chains: Abandonment in Love Relationships in the
Fiction of Selected West African Writers (1994)
/
Songs of the Hearth
(1993) /
Homage to My People
(2004) /
A History of Africana Women's Literature (2004)
Black
Nationalists: Reconsidering Du Bois, Garvey, Booker T. &
Nkrumah (1999)
Chinua Achebe: The Man and His Works (2006)
*
* * * *
The Fourth World Multiculturalism as Antidote to
Global Violence1
By
Rose Ure Mezu
Redefinition of Stale
Economic Nomenclatures:
In the essay, “The
Fourth World: In the Belly of the Beast,” Amin Sharif introduces a
central argument positing that historically,
anti-colonial and anti-imperialist national liberation
struggles were waged by people of the “Third World”
against the First World Powers of Europe during the
1950s and ‘60s. “Third World” he explains acts as a term
of euphuism meant to encompass the countries of Asia,
Africa, and Latin America. With the break-up of the
“Second World” - the republics of the Soviet bloc,
Capitalism and Socialism seem to have converged and
merged into each other arguably rendering all the terms
– First, Second and Third Worlds - non-relevant.
Sharif’s argument
leaves Cuba’s Fidel Castro standing as the last of the
old style Third World revolutionaries. In the vacuum of
leadership created by the exit of China’s Mao Tse Tung
and Ghana’s Kwame Nkrumah. Asia and Africa have
subsequently dissolved into fragmented economic blocks.
Without devaluing the accomplishments of the peoples and
leaders who waged the anti-colonial struggle within the
Third World, and while still acknowledging that a lot of
the objectives they fought for has been accomplished,
continues Sharif, those in opposition to the “First
World” necessarily have to devise a new analysis that
“will . . . determine how best to advance the struggle
for peace and justice in the world,” especially for
those existing outside the margins of economic and
political power. Evidently, First, Second and Third
Worlds have become stale nomenclatures.
Usually, discourses
on matters of governance often pit the West (Europe and
America) and non-Western blocs against each other
because such discussions are often complicated by racial
attitudes, the demand for cultural integrity, especially
where issues of economics, family, and religion are
integrally implicated. Ideals of national pride,
threats to Family and cultural authenticity become also
challenged. Presently, the resultant clash of cultures
has produced a world that is reeling in chaos,
threatening to tumble into an abyss of interminable
struggles, and disquietude. For ideological theorists
and writers in the Humanities, this has vast
implications on the scope of which this essay sets
out to explore.
In the past, with their creative imagination and as
producers of literature, writers occupied an honorific
and quasi-sacred role different from mere intellectuals
who in a lesser capacity serve as critics. But our
postmodern world has witnessed the writer taking on,
Edward Said would argue, “more and more of the
intellectual's adversarial attributes in such activities
as speaking the truth to power, being a witness to
persecution and suffering, supplying a dissenting voice
in conflicts with authority, [interjecting Self in
debates about] freedom of speech and censorship, truth
and reconciliation” (“The Public Role of Writers and
Intellectuals” 1). And thus the role of the
Intellectual who used to be the sole critic of power and
society, and that special symbolic role of the writer
have been amalgamated into one. As a result, the
postmodernist writer has become “both the observer and
recorder of societal mores as well as critic and
teacher” (Mezu,
Chinua Achebe: The Man and His Works).
Consequently, in this age, the writer is no longer
beyond appropriating the role of a critic by challenging
gross social inequities entrenched in policies by global
political institutions or economic hegemonies. Chinua
Achebe, Africa’s pre-eminent writer and essayist who in
his works combines both roles clarifies this situation
in his own words:
|
It is clear to me that an “African creative
writer” who tries to avoid the big social
and political issues of contemporary Africa
will end up being completely irrelevant—like
the absurd man in the proverb who leaves his
burning house to pursue a rat fleeing from
the flames [. . .] Take for instance the
issue of racial
inequality
which—whether or not we realize it—is at the
very root of Africa’s problems and has been
for four hundred years. . . . (Achebe,
Morning Yet On
Creation Day 78;
my emphasis) |
Therefore, today’s writer feels sufficiently empowered
to engage in the global discursive agenda.
Consequently, this
essay grounds itself on Postcolonial critical theories
privileging writers, cultural theorists/critics such as
Chinua Achebe, Edward Said, Fanon, Amin Sharif, and
Ishmael Reed. Achebe critiques Universalism as a
Eurocentric trope that prescribes a limiting, carved-out
space which renders natives of Non-Western countries
objects instead of Subjects of their own cultural
heritage. Achebe, Said, Fanon, and Reed theorize that
the monocultural / universalist (read – ethnocultural)
view of life has produced in most non-Western countries,
a type of democratic political model directly in
conflict with their communal/traditional and/or
religion-based styles of governance. The resulting
socio-cultural and politico-economic disharmony has
created a category of disenchanted, usually greedy,
unpatriotic natives who owe neither identification nor
allegiance to present Western-inspired styles of
governance.
Thus, many natives
from the upper and middle classes of many postcolonial
nations are too busy exploiting their own citizens to
care for the poor underclass, or provide quality,
selfless leadership. Now, even if we disagree with
Sharif’s central argument explained in the first
paragraph and we then go on to presume the categories of
First, Second and Third Worlds to still be in existence,
the remaining exploited class can be termed—the
Fourth World (as defined by Amin Sharif)—a
category that shows remarkable similarities in their
economic conditions irrespective of geo-cultural
locations. Consequently, this essay examines some of
the concepts contained in the writings of Achebe, Said,
Fanon, Sharif ,and Ishmael Reed and their implied or
explicit call for a redefinition of such political
nomenclatures since a global “Fourth World” seems to
have emerged as the world’s suffering poor. These
writers’ theses show concern for this class, argue for
an openness that calls for multiculturalism, or "transnationalism"—
the term being used as a critical term to describe the
complex flow of culture emanating from the current
constant mobility of people, monies, and ideas across
national boundaries. Rather than monoculturalism posing
as a universalist ideology, the concepts of
multiculturalism/transnationalism could provide viable
options towards the attainment of world peace in an age
of troubling globalization.
Defined Postcolonial
Critical Theories:
As technology shrinks global borders, the plight of the
world’s exploited poor—the Fourth World—adopts a
remarkable similarity that cuts across geographical
boundaries. It must be pointed out that the set of
problems that colonized nations are presently grappling
with, created by the end of colonial adventurism and
rule, gave rise to postcolonial theories in sociology,
philosophy, literature, and films. Literature written
mostly in the 1970s by erstwhile colonized writers, or
even by citizens of colonizing countries produced the
critical implements of postcolonial theories. For
instance, the dilemma of forging a national identity led
Achebe to develop the tradition of Cultural Nationalism;
it also prompted Said’s theory of Orientalism—the
literary / political discourse surrounding Middle
Eastern peoples even though it originated in the West
where Said was residing.
Orientalism defined an ideology that depicts persons
from the Orient as eccentrically exotic, backward,
sensual, passive and separate as the non-Western Other;
an individual considered inferior, conquerable and
therefore to be rechristianized/civilized to accept the
values of the dominant society. Equally, Achebe
believed that a putative “superior” culture to sustain
its self-image must of necessity denigrate as “inferior”
the culture it hopes to exploit, thus receiving moral
justification for the economic rape of the African
continent. In “The African Writer and the Biafran
Cause,” Achebe points out that “no one arrogates to
himself the right to order the lives of a whole people
unless he takes for granted his own superiority over
those people. European colonizers of Africa had no
difficulty in taking their own superiority for granted”
(Morning Yet on Creation Day 79).
To illustrate
further the thesis that racism embodies a set of
behavioral attitudes needed for the West to control the
non-white populations of the world, Cultural Historian
Milton G. Allimadi singles out the Ethiopian/Italian
19th-century conflict to explain the origin of so much
misrepresentation of Africa as inferior to justify the
eventual rapacious appropriation of the Continent’s
resources:
|
White writers flooded
Europe and the United States with poisonous
screeds on the barbarity and soullessness of
Africans, preparing public opinion for the
rape of the continent's resources.
"Explorers" with little knowledge of the
geography begged Africans for directions to
their next "discovery," then were knighted
for bringing the African interior under the
sway of "Christian civilization." But
Ethiopia's King Menelik II burst the
European bubble, humiliating the Italians in
battle. |
Eleven years later, on the
Abyssinian front (Ethiopia), the Italian ruler Francesco
Crispi (a descendant of Machiavelli) defeated Menelik
II, the Abyssinian monarch, in a major battle, and on
February 2nd 1890, the N.Y. Times exulted:
|
Sooner or later, the
powerful nation was destined to bring the
savage tribe into abject submission or
demolish it utterly". . . "The justice
of the cause had nothing to do with this
foregone conclusion" (Black
Agenda Report). |
However, the Ethiopians regrouped and
successfully defended themselves, forcing Italy to pay
several million pounds as compensation before releasing
the captured Italian soldiers. Allimadi argues: “with a
few more generals like Ethiopia’s Menelik II fighting
against such as Italy’s General Menelik, the history of
Africa could have taken a dramatically different course
(Black
Agenda Report).
Thus, like Achebe
and others, Allimadi would go back to history to ground
the charge that racism is at the bottom of the West’s
relations with the Others. As Said has also explained,
the non-Western Other is constructed as an irrational
and morally backward being, “savage,” and without
enlightenment. It follows then that as discursive
theory, Postcolonialism stands in direct opposition to
Eurocentrism which is interpreted as embodying in itself
notions of geo-parochialism, cultural chauvinism, and an
explicitly narrow construction of what constitutes
civilization. Edward Said would then explain:
|
My
contention is that Orientalism is
fundamentally a political doctrine willed
over the Orient because the Orient was
weaker than the West, which elided the
Orient’s difference with its weakness. . . .
As a cultural apparatus Orientalism is all
aggression, activity, judgment,
will-to-truth, and knowledge (Said,
Orientalism 204). |
Such a willful
misrepresentation of the Other, Orientalism suggests,
produced a racial policy of economic exploitation and
politics of power, subjugation, and control.
Actually, such
theoretical formulations have earlier precedence in
Frantz Fanon who directly influenced the postcolonial
theories of Said and Homi Bhabha. Fanon’s 1956 letter
of resignation as Head of the Psychiatry Department at
the Blida-Joinville Hospital in Algeria encapsulates his
theory of the psychology of colonial domination, arguing
that the colonial mission is incompatible with ethical
psychiatric practice:
|
If psychiatry is the
medical technique that aims to enable man no
longer to be a stranger to his environment,
I owe it to myself to affirm that the
[native], permanently an alien in his own
country, lives in a state of absolute
depersonalization. . . . The events in
Algeria are the logical consequence of an
abortive attempt to decerebralize a people (Toward
the African Revolution 53). |
Fanon would
eventually go beyond theoretical intellectual discourses
to actively concretize his beliefs by fleeing to Tunisia
and working openly with the Algerian independence
movement.
Today, in the
countries of Asia, Africa, and other parts of the world,
the sufferings of vast multitudes as a result of war,
famine, and ethnic/ religious intolerance claim Western
colonial exploitation as a causative factor. These
casualties of aggression, interminable wars, and misrule
in these cultural spaces also constitute the Fourth
World, projecting a frightening prism where life has no
meaning, where basic family structure is disrupted, and
any cohesive, national framework rendered unworkable and
where life is under constant threat of annihilation.
While Said was more
specifically preoccupied with the Orient around 1978,
Achebe had by 1975 actually formulated his postcolonial
ideas in what would be called Colonialist theory as
articulated in his first body of essays, Morning Yet
On Creation Day. Therefore, Achebe’s
postcolonialist theory precedes Said’s even as both
their theories share considerable similarity. Early
models like C. L. R. James and W. E. B. Du Bois have,
either anticipated, drawn from, critiqued and/or applied
postcolonial theory to their works. Edward Wilmot Blyden
(1832-1912) in his groundbreaking Christianity, Islam
and the Negro Race (1887) recommends a ”retour aux
sources” that would exalt the best features in African
culture (such as adopting African names, emulating
traditional African dress) and condemn emulating
European culture indiscriminately. Other figures like
Ishmael Reed, Toni Morrison, Alice Walker, and many
others have also in their works traced diasporic links
between Africa and the new worlds. Achebe’s goal to
re-educate peoples of African descent using his
tradition-based stories speaks for itself:
|
. . .
to help my society
regain belief in itself and put away the
complexes of the years of denigration and
self-abasement. . . . [f]or no
thinking African [Black] can escape the
wound on his soul . . . I would be quite
satisfied if my novels (especially the ones
I set in the past) did no more than teach my
readers that their past—with
all its imperfections—was
not one long night of savagery from which
the first European acting on God's behalf
delivered us (“The Novelist as a Teacher
“ in MYOCD 45). |
Thus Achebe’s preoccupation is to bend the craft of
writing to discover a new political discourse that would
help construct a national identity, tackle issues of
proper governance, while exploring both the nature of
power, and the place and integrity of the human being
within governance. Achebe’s intent was to use his “son
of the soil” narratives to dilute if not deflate the
European Colonizer’s notion of superiority. In an
interview with Bill Moyers, Achebe “pooh-poohed” the
supposed Western democratic ideals of governance
as nothing but a model of unbridled tyranny, seeing that
the European colonials neither consulted the natives nor
were they accountable to them, but only sought to cart
away the continent’s vast wealth. And so, upon
Independence, the West left no truly working model of
democracy; nor did the departing colonizers take time to
train in the right way the educated Africans to whom
they were handing over. Rather, they sought to undercut
these Western-trained elite in every possible way.
The result was a democratic governing
system that at core was at variance with the natives’
communal/moral ideals which traditionally integrated a
cultural oneness where each was the brother’s keeper.
Closely tied to the disintegrating cultural space is the
intrusion of the foreign powers’ postcolonial
manipulation of the native economy. In many
post-Independence nations of Africa, there were no known
or familiar moral-value codes to command the political
allegiance of the governed, nor were there punitive
measures with which the people empathized, or were able
to accept. And so, the natives owed no allegiance to
this alien system, resulting in a “free-for-all”
mentality, and massive corruption. The helpless
citizens of Africa have become the tragic casualties of
unbridled corruption and massive mis-government by
ruling native stooges manipulated by foreign Western
powers.
The many wars—internal
and external—instigated
by sheer greed (see the movies—Blood
Diamond and
Hotel Rwanda), have produced unprecedented
poverty levels within the populace whose plight is
worsened by famine, the scourge of AIDS with its
attendant difficulty in obtaining needed drugs, and lack
of basic social amenities needed to improve the quality
of life. If Africa still constitutes the Third World,
then these tragic victims of postcolonial misrule and
foreign manipulation indeed constitute the Fourth World—a
disempowered cadre with no proper tools to achieve for
itself a life of quality, meaning, and/or dignity. What
subsists is a Fourth World in complete variance with its
country’s power structure. Interpretively, it should be
assumed that this Fourth World encompasses an
impoverished working class—a
powerless underclass—additionally
confronted with the reality that its flourishing middle
class is either too impotent, or too comfortable to wish
to help them. And so Sharif argues that
|
the middle class has
little or no capacity to lead the majority
of its Fourth World brothers and sisters in
the struggle for economic, cultural, or
political progress. It will be the Fourth
World middle class who will be the first to
compromise, to integrate, and assimilate.
They will rally the working masses to a
false flag of racial and class solidarity
and then leave them standing beneath that
banner when their goals are accomplished. |
Fanon made a
similar argument decades earlier, demonstrating his
disgust with the greed and politicking of the comprador
bourgeoisie in new African nations. The brand of
nationalism espoused by these classes, and even by the
urban proletariat is inadequate for total revolution, he
argued, because such classes benefit from the economic
structures of imperialism. According to Fanon, true
African revolution can only emerge from the peasants, or
"fellaheen" – a term that is encompassed within the
Fourth World. Therefore, he insisted, peasants
themselves should be at the vanguard of any revolution.
Ishmael Reed’s Critique
of Universalism:
Since the Fourth World can therefore be defined as the
powerless underclass of any nation, it follows that the
affluent nations of the West possess within their
societies a Fourth World that is underserved and
underprivileged. These are made up of mostly descendants
of Africans enslaved in America, and of generations of
children (now citizens) of immigrants—African, Arabs and
Asian—from
former colonies of western nations. For example,
England had in the past experienced violent race riots
from its Fourth World population. In France, unrest in
the impoverished suburbs of northeastern Paris, poverty
and lawlessness of rundown big-city suburbs, and
France’s immigration policy have combined to create
ghettos for generations of locally-born citizens of
North African and black African origin who suffer
discrimination in housing, education and jobs. These
feel cheated by France's official promises of liberty,
equality and fraternity. The desperateness of the
situation prompted Manuel Valls, mayor of Evry, South of
Paris, to say: "We're afraid that what's happening in
Seine Saint Denis will spread.
[Read
Lessons
from France / Paris
Is Burning /"The
Pyres of Autumn"
/
Responses
to Jean Baudrillard.]
We have to give these people a
message of hope."
Muslim Village. The very existence of these young
people representing the underbelly of the French society
exemplifies the introduction of non-Western peoples into
the very heart of a post-modern world that lacks proper
analysis by cultural theorists. By tracing their origin
from the “Third World,” they now constitute an entirely
new class of people that certainly do not fit within the
“First World” nations in which they reside. As part of
the Fourth World, they understand the workings of
Western democracy and the trappings of modernity, but
they do not benefit from the privileges. Du Bois’s
trope of Double Consciousness can justifiably be applied
to their socio-economic and cultural malaise since “they
are not wholly of their Mother Country nor are they full
citizens of the post-modern West.”
For its part, the
United States is still wrestling with how to make a
greater white American culture accommodate and integrate
African-Americans and other non-whites. When in 2005
Katrina ravaged New Orleans, the appalling conditions of
the Black working class and the poorest Blacks in the
U.S. were revealed in graphic detail. This incident
reopened the sore topic of the inability of the poorest
population to benefit from the affluence of the greater
American society since plagued by crippling poverty,
damaged by drugs, violence, imprisonment, and family
dysfunctions. The totally deprived remain the Fourth
World constituency living within an affluent First
World.
Thus enters Ishmael
Reed with his Afro-based discourse and postcolonial
poetics of Literary Neo-Hoodism, a trope Reed uses to
offer viable tools with which to fight socio-economic
exclusion. His writings—usually
humorously satiric—provide
a multicultural, transnational perspective which he
believes can empower individual/communal reconnection to
Africa’s cultural and spiritual heritage and also serve
the present global community well. Reed’s Neo-Hoodism
is a poetics fashioned through textual abrogation,
subverting canonical characters, reconstructing iconical
Western texts.
All of Reed’s
writings, especially
Japanese by Spring (1993) are crafted to
privilege multiculturalism over an “anti-intellectual”
monoculturalism. Linking multilingualism,
multiculturalism and Globalism, Reed predicts the
destruction of American economy by advocates of a
unilingual, monocultural national policy which he
considers too narrow and incapable of the kind of
elasticity needed to promote a great global culture,
says Reed. His character in
Japanese by Spring, Benjamin “Chappie” Puttbutt,
for instance, shows the way of transnational cooperation
by learning to speak Japanese and Yoruba—a
Nigerian language. In fact, chagrined but reformed by
the Japanese Dr. Yamato’s two month-old reign of terror,
Crabtree the Classics professor now seeks to reform his
Caucasian colleagues.
|
[Yamato] was just giving
us a dose of our own medicine. . . . For
years, we’ve been saying that our traditions
and our standards were universal, but Dr.
Yamato has taught us that two can play at
the game. And Puttbutt . . . Thank you for
opening my head. . . I was starving it. I
was depriving it of intellectual nutrition;
. . . this wonderful machine can take us to
places beyond our wildest dreams. It was my
stupid arrogance, my devotion to these
standards that almost prevented me from
going on this wonderful adventure. Learning
a new language and a new world. Discovering
Yoruba. . . . I have learned a language that
transports me to a culture that’s two
thousand years old. Have they ever produced
a Tolstoy? They have produced Tolstoys.
Have they produced a Homer. They have
hundreds of Homers. We were just too lazy
and arrogant to find out. . . . It is our
silly racial pride that is preventing us
from living in peace (Japanese
by Spring 156). |
Reed’s novel
Japanese by Spring therefore recommends a model
of multicultural synthesis such as the flourishing one
that rejuvenated 20th Century European Art—a
rejuvenation which was achieved through borrowings from
African Arts. For Reed, whose literary motto is Writin’
is indeed Fightin,’ multiculturalism is quintessentially
the basic step towards intercultural understanding for a
troubled World tottering on the brink of disintegration.
Fourth World and Recipe
for Global Peace
All the
writers/theorists cited in this paper provide concrete
recipes for the achievement of peace within and among
nations. Making a case for respect of cultural space,
Chinua Achebe insists on cultural cum religious
accommodation as a sine qua non for harmonious global
living. Within a setting of varied cultural groupings,
the imposition of an absolutist, monocultural view of
life breeds resentment and a disposition to foment
violence in subjugated groups of minorities who grouped
together, given time, would constitute a majority.
Achebe reinforces this viewpoint by citing the
pragmatism of the Igbos of Nigeria—a
pragmatism that posits that “where one thing stands,
something else can stand beside it.” It is a worldview
that makes room for the rights of other peoples of our
one world to exist more so because theorists such as
Francis Cress Welsing insists that the West constitutes
a “tiny minority, fewer than one tenth of the people on
the planet [if you put together] the Black, Brown, Red
and Yellow people” (Africa
Within).
Summed up in the
metaphor of the dancing masquerade who dances to all
sides of the market square in other to see the entire
crowd, this metaphor says that no one group has an
absolute view of reality. Interpretively, whenever any
political authority, or any religion becomes
universalist and indisputable, the result is sure to be
tyranny over all others. Said’s Orientalism equally
argues for the rights of Others to experience equity in
intercultural relations. Underlying all these views is
the apprehension of racism as a both a political reality
and a set of private attitudes - neither of which would
disappear through wishful thinking. This is a view that
Frances Cress Welsing in
The Isis Papers: The Keys to the Colors
emphasizes when she describes Racism as a behavioral
system for survival which entails dominating all others.
Perhaps, to be taken seriously is the threat posed by
the existence of a depressed and languishing Fourth
World populations within an affluent First World. Amin
Sharif’s rhetoric though hyperbolic and
ominous-sounding, yet deserves careful attention when he
says:
|
The Fourth World will no
longer sanction the West’s incursions into
Africa, Asia, and Latin America for economic
gains. We will not allow you to fatten
yourselves on the exploitation of our
brothers and sisters throughout the world.
We will no longer fill the ranks of your
armed forces or your jails. We will no
longer starve while you eat nor cry while
you laugh. We declare ourselves free to be
fully Asian, Arab, and African within your
midst, to be less would make us subhuman in
our own eyes. We will no longer watch as
our children are raised without dignity or
hope. We will no longer give you our labor
without a fair wage. We will no longer give
you our allegiance without full
citizenship.
We stand ready to throw
all your platitudes about democracy,
freedom, and brotherhood back in your face
whether you rule in America or Europe. We
will hound you until you allow us to fulfill
our dreams of being fully human as you are
fully human. We, the people of the Fourth
World, have come of age. And, we want from
you only that which you have promised to
yourselves. That is the right to live
without fear and want in the world. Give us
this and you need not fear us. Deny us this
and we have no other alternative but to
realize our humanity at your expense. |
In
The Wretched of the Earth, Fanon is said to
critique the Manichean perspective with its binary
system in which black is bad and white is good, and
argues for an entirely new world which given the degree
of class and cultural inequities must of essence come
into being. Fanon’s stance like Sharif’s is for a
violent revolution. But, on the other hand, Chinua
Achebe’s advocacy is for a peaceful new world predicated
on the fundamental values of humaneness, decency, and
fair play, a world that holds out “dignity and hope”
that full citizenship into the human community demands.
* *
* * *
When this essay was
read out before the 2007 North East Modern Language
Association (NEMLA) Conference assembly, it sparked a
most intense, soul-searching question-and-answer
discussion. Concerned conference participants wanted to
know how the Fourth World population can be lifted out
of their quagmire of poverty, illiteracy, and misery.
What role could intellectuals play? The Writers
discussed in this essay have provided the model of
writing as activism, storytelling as a veritable mode of
teaching, educating, correcting inequities and making
people think. Can ideologues help? Well, well-placed
ideologues have in the past used and discarded members
of the Fourth World as their ambitions are achieved.
Certainly, it was agreed, national governments around
the world have the most responsibility through
structural reforms to provide the tools needed to give
the Fourth World population good educational and
professional tools needed to make good wages with which
they can maintain families, and lead a meaningful
existence.
But yet, they
questioned, what can individuals do? Every individual
has the capacity to create an oasis of comfort through
useful activities from any location, using available
tools. People of privilege can always set up
foundations, organizations or whatever that can promote
literacy, compassion, improved quality of life, justice
and empowerment towards reclaiming full human equality
that is every person’s Divine birth right.. For Achebe,
for Rudy Lewis with
ChickenBones: A Journal, for me Rose Ure Mezu,
or for Ishmael Reed as he reiterates with each work,
indeed in a world of inequities, writin’ is fightin.’
Thus, if serious,
sustained efforts are to be made towards erasing the
category that Amin Sharif has termed the Fourth World
and uplifting its population from being the wretched of
the earth, if multiculturalism is adopted as a means of
mutually respecting cultural living, hope exists that
these would constitute viable antidotes to global
violence—a
revolution to be achieved not through conflicts but with
values that promote peaceful global cohabitation.
Notes:
1. This essay is a modified version of the one which
as panel Chair / presenter I presented on March 4, 2007
before the assembled NEMLA Baltimore 2007 conference
audience.
* * *
* *
Works Cited:
Achebe, Chinua. “The African Writer
and the Biafran Cause XE “The African Writer and the
Biafran Cause” .” In Morning Yet On Creation Day.
London: Heinemann, 1975. 78-84.
Allimadi, Milton G.
Black Agenda Report.
Bhabha, Homi. "Interrogating
Identity: Frantz Fanon and the Postcolonial
Prerogative." In The Location of Culture.
London: Routledge, 1994. 40-66.
Chowdhry, Geeta and Sheila Nair,
eds. Power in a Postcolonial World: Race, Gender and
Class in International Relations. London: Routledge,
2002.
“Cultural Chauvinism and the
Liberal International Order - ‘West vs Rest’ in Asia’s
Financial Crisis." In Chowdhry and S. Nair (eds),
Power in a Postcolonial World: Race, Gender and Class in
International Relations (London: Routledge, 2002).
ISAnet.org.
de Beauvoir, Simone. Force of
Circumstance. New York: Putnam, 1964.
Bergner, Gwen. "Who Is That Masked
Woman? or, The Role of Gender in Fanon's Black Skin,
White Masks." PMLA 110.1 (January 1995):
75-88.
Caute, David. Frantz Fanon.
New York: The Viking Press, 1970.
Fanon, Frantz. The Wretched of
the Earth. New York, 1965. Reprint of Les damnes
de la terre. Paris, 1961.
.. . . . . ……. Black Skin, White
Masks. New York: Grove, 1967. Reprint of Peau
noire, masques blancs. Paris, 1952.
.. . . . . ……. Studies in a
Dying Colonialism, or A Dying Colonialism. New York,
1965. Reprint of L'an cinq de la révolution
algerienne. Paris, 1959.
.. . . . . ……. Toward the
African Revolution. New York, 1967. Reprint of
Pour la révolution africaine. Paris, 1964.
Fuss, Diana. "Interior Colonies:
Frantz Fanon and the Politics of Identification."
Diacritics (Summer-Fall ‘94):20-42.
Gates, Henry Louis. "Critical
Fanonism." Critical Inquiry 17 (1992): 457-470.
Geismar, Peter. Fanon. New
York: The Dial Press, 1971.
Gendzier, Irene L. Frantz Fanon:
A Critical Study. New York: Pantheon Books-Random
House, 1973.
Gordon, Lewis R. Fanon and the
Crisis of European Man. New York: Routledge, 1995.
"Homage to Frantz Fanon."
Présence Africaine 12 (1962): 130-152. Ten writers,
politicians and scholars contributed to this special
section, including Aimé Césaire and Nkrumah.
Memmi, Albert. "The Impossible Life
of Frantz Fanon." Massachusetts Review (Winter
1973): 39.
Said, Edward. Culture and
Imperialism. New York: Vintage Books-Random House,
1993.
. . . . . . . . . . .
Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books, 1979.
Sharif, Amin. “The Fourth World:
In the Belly of the Beast.”
ChickenBones: A Journalism 10 November 2005.
Welsing, Francis Cress. The Isis
Papers: The Keys to the Colors. Chicago, Illinois:
Third World Press, 1991.
. . . . . . . . . . . Final
Call.com News: “An Interview with Dr. Frances
Cress Welsing.”
Africa Within (November 26, 2002).
Copyright by Dr.
Rose Ure Mezu / March 31, 2007
* *
* * *
Other essays by Dr. Rose Ure Mezu:
An Africana
Blueprint for Living in the 3rd Millennium
Global Community1: An Essay
Pope
John Paul II: A Life with a Mission: A Mission of Grace and Moral
Strength
A History
of Africana Women's Literature (Introduction)
Africana
Women: Their Historic Past and Future
Activism
Black
Nationalists: Reconsidering: Du Bois, Garvey, Booker T., &
Nkrumah (Introduction)
Chinua Achebe The
Man and His Works (Introduction)
* *
* * *
Films on Africa: Blood
Diamond /
Hotel Rwanda /
LUMUMBA /
FAAT KINÉ
/
The Last King of
Scotland /
Congo: White King
* *
* * *
* *
* * *
4 April 2007 |