|
Works by J.P. Clark
Poems
/
A Reed in the Tide (1965)
/
Casualties: Poems (1970)
/ Song of a Goat
(play, 1961) /
The Bikoroa Plays: The Boat; The Return Home; Full Circle (1985)
/
The Ozidi Saga
(1991) /
Collected Plays and Poems, 1958-1988
(1991)
* * * *
*
John Pepper Clark's Raft Running
Adrift
By
Arthur
Edgar E. Smith
John Pepper Clark,
born of Ijaw parents, is along with Wole Soyinka one of
the most articulate, and proficient literary artists to
have come from Africa. He received his early education
at the Native Administration School and the prestigious
Government College in Ugheli. He then got his Bachelors
degree in English at the University of Ibadan, where
Wole Soyinka also studied. There he edited various
magazines including the Beacon and The Horn. Upon
graduation from Ibadan, he worked as an information
officer in the old Western Region of Nigeria, as
features editor of the Daily Express, and
research fellow at the Institute of African Studies,
University of Ibadan. He served for several years as a
professor of English at the University of Lagos until
his retirement in 1980. In 1982, along with his wife (a
professor and former director of the Centre for Cultural
Studies at the University of Lagos), he founded the Pec
Repertory Theatre in Lagos. Since his retirement, he
has held visiting professorial appointments at several
U.S. universities, including Yale.
Clark is most
remembered for his poetry, including:
Poems a
group of forty lyrics treating heterogeneous themes;
A Reed in the Tide (1965), focusing on his
indigenous African background and his experience in
America and other places;
Casualties: Poems
(1970), illustrating the horrendous events of the
Nigeria-Biafra war; A Decade of Tongues (1981);
State of the Union (1981), which highlights his
apprehension concerning the sociopolitical events in
Nigeria; Mandela and Other Poems (1988), which
deals with the perennial problem of aging and death.
Throughout his
work, themes such as the following recur: violence and
protest, institutional corruption, the beauty of nature
and the landscape, colonialism and the inhumanity of
the human race. Clark frequently dealt with these themes
through a complex interweaving of indigenous African
imagery with that of the Western literary tradition.
Clark's dramatic
work includes
Song of a Goat (1961), a tragedy
cast in the Greek classical mode in which Zifa is the
protagonist. His impotence causes his wife Ebiere and
his brother Tonye to indulge in an illicit love
relationship resulting in suicide. Then follows its
sequel, The Masquerade (1964), in which Dibiri's
rage culminates in the death of his suitor Tufa. Other
works include: The Raft (1964), in which four men
drift helplessly down the Niger aboard a log raft. (This
play will be the focus of this article.) Then there are
Ozidi (1966), an epic drama rooted in Ijaw saga; and
The
Boat (1981), a prose drama documenting Ngbilebiri
history.
Clark's other works
include his critical study The Example of Shakespeare
(1970), in which he articulates his aesthetics and his
journalistic essays in the daily national newspapers. In
America, Their America (a travelogue), he
criticizes American society and its values. He has,
since his retirement, continued to play an active role
in literary affairs, a role for which he is increasingly
gaining international recognition receiving in 1991 the
Nigerian National Merit Award for literary excellence
and the publication, by Howard University of his two
definitive volumes,
The Ozidi Saga and
Collected Plays and Poems,1958-1988.
Though not a
tragedy, J.P. Clark’s The Raft shows the misadventures
of four men—Olutu.
Kengide, Ogrope and Ibodo—who
in attempting to bring logs downstream to be sold,
drift down the Niger in their lumber raft. Because the
raft drifts from its moorings it goes out of control.
The four men are thus cut off from all else except each
other and left to face hunger and danger together.
Caught in a whirlpool, they rig a sail so that a storm
will blow them out, but the raft breaks up and Oloto is
carried off on the part with the sail. There three
survivors drift until a steamboat comes up. Ogrope,
trying to swim to the boat to be rescued, is beaten off
by its crew and caught in its stern- wheel. Kengide and
Ibodo drift on towards Burutu but become lost in the fog
while trying to make a landfall by night.
Though THE RAFT is
set in a modern situation, its characters are at the
same time all bound up by tradition. Their ill-fatedness
is like that of others in Clark’s earlier plays bound to
some ancestral or cosmic force. This is suggested when
Ibodo complains:
|
I promised you a goat
At the next festival, my great –
grandmother. Now
How have you led us
into this? |
However, the
traditional has been dwarfed and is being
strangulated by the modern. As Kengide states, they have
more belief in what is foreign than what is local.
That is why they are never making any good. Ogro, in
his delusion, believes that the old chief will give his
daughter to marry without paying any dowry, not
realizing as Kengide does that:
|
The old chiefs who would hand out
The best of their daughters like that died
Out generations
ago. [p106] |
And Kengide himself parallels the
oracle to places where one could go to get bad
pronouncements, thus dismissing the question of his
visiting one.
The world presented
here is one in which the modern world has eaten deeply
into the traditional roots of the society. Even at
that, modernism still co-exists ,uneasily though, amidst
the people bringing along with it various social and
economic malaise which are expounded upon by the
different characters in the play and which is
manifested in their behaviour and attitude.
The drifting of the
raft in which the four lumbermen are borne, if not
trapped, symbolizes the drifting of modern man,
direction-less and with futile efforts made to escape a
tragic fate, as could be sensed in their conversation:
|
Ogro: Will anyone tell
where we are?
Olotu: Yes, where
exactly are we going now?
Ibobo: I can’t see through the grey baft
spread
Of the night. The moon has long
turned in, and not
A single star in the skies. Why
doesn’t
Someone turn
up the lamp?
Kengide: No, that will only serve to create
A pale of light. From inside
that pool even
A dog
will not see.
Ogro: I think I can just see to my right
There trees
on the bank drifting past.
Kengide: Don’t
be an idiot; it’s we
Who are
doing the drifting. |
The futility of life is not only
suggested by the doomed voyage of the raft but by the
uncertain attitude and words of the characters
themselves:
|
Ibobo: Do they ever sing to laugh in your
part
Of the
country?
Ogro: No, each day some poor fellow is
either
Going out with a hiss or making
his brief
Entrance with a howl, and the
women wail
Going to bed and wake up wailing,
for their seeds
Are eaten up
by the black beetle.
Ibobo: Forgive me, Ogro, in my place too,
plants
Wilt and die, but all
The same,
we have our happy seasons.
Kengide: That is because, like the very
creeks
You live on, your ways
meander like the python
You worship. Thus you drink
where you
Defecate, and will have
others believe
It’s
living water.
Ibodo: And your people
have pure wells and sweet springs!
Kengide: No, water
swirling with mud. |
For all the
characters, life is a bitter pill. They are therefore
subjected to perpetual suffering and dependency.
Nothing more emphasizes this than that their fate is
being tied and controlled by a rich man wining away at
Warri whilst they slave for him. This pathetic
dependency syndrome is elaborated on by Kengide whilst
relating his past plight:
|
Always
Making money for some man other
Than myself that has
been my fortune |
In spite of the difficulty and
tedium of the work all they receive is a pittance. This
is regardless of the fact that their employers and
economic overlords ‘drain/The Delta of all that’s in it,
and not/A shrimp slips past their fat fingers.’
This pathetic situation is cogently
and aptly described by Kengide:
|
In this game
Of getting rich, it is eat me or I eat
You, and no man wants to stew in the pot,
Not if he can help
it.
[p120] |
The exploitation soars to such
inhuman dimensions that Ogroo was already thinking that
one real fisherman ought to be fishing for men next as:
|
There was
No creek into which he did not make
incursion
Not even the mosquitoes could keep him and
his band
Of paddlers out. |
Such inhumanity of
man to man could also be seen in the failure of the
captain of a ship to come to the lumbermen’s rescue.
The passengers instead were callously stoning Ogro with
coals, ‘Beating off his hands with bars of iron’ and
thus forcing him to slump back into the deep to be
caught in the mortal arms/Of that stern-wheeling
engine.’ This seems a far cry from the communal spirit
of the traditional world. Thus the direction the modern
world has taken is towards doom or nemesis as even
within the raft itself the lumbermen are all cut up in
various forms of differences including those of opinion
and ethnic origin.
This might well be
the likely root for their fate. R.N.Egudu senses the
irony in Ibodo and Kengide getting drowned when almost
at the port. The irony could not also be missed that it
was after the raft had been rescued from the whirlpool
and the man had rejoiced for its resumed movement that
it broke into two As Egudu points out, such an irony is
not rare in real life.
The parable of the
five fingers [p119] pinpoints the pervasiveness of
corruption. For all the four are swimming in corruption.
Only one, the thumb, is courageous enough to count
itself out of such a grabbing spree. It is thus
representative of the negligible minority of the society
who are bold and socially committed enough to stand up
and say ‘No’ and thus refuse to be swallowed by the
corruptive influence of the majority. The small finger
stands for the one whose greed initiates the corruption
of the other three fingers. This together with the
allusion to the insatiable appetite of their employers
for wealth and the cut-throat fight of the timber
merchants to outmaneuver each other further emphasizes
the mercenary nature of their materialistic quest. So
the fact that only one of the five fingers has the
courage to stand firm says a lot about the moral
weakness of the people and the sheer force of the vice
in infecting so many.
Greed is stepped up
one rung further when the government which one should
expect to be protecting the people from exploitation is
portrayed as conniving against their interests. This is
evident in the Government clubbing up against its own
very people whom they should be protecting and
encouraging. The pathetic consequences of this is seen
in Kengide’s fate. After working long for a
foreign-controlled company, he yields to the crippling
demands from his hungry family for him to join the
strike. But due to the politician’s treachery and the
instigation from the papers, the strike fails. The
strikers are then left alone to suffer the grave
consequences of their actions. This means that their
conditions worsen, taxes and prices on everything in the
market are raised and the earning power of producers
shortened.
In craving for more
votes the same politicians had ‘promised Jericho
itself’. But the sooner they got firmly entrenched in
power did they forget these promises. Only when too
late did the people realize how they were being
deceived. All the ‘workers had at their incitement
staked/All to build’ [p131] were destroyed. With
infinite greed, they ‘drain/The Delta of all that’s in
it’ leaving not a single shrimp to slip past them. It
is they, the helpless poor, Kengide complains, who get
destroyed: ‘Man, it is/We ordinary grass shrubs who get
crashed/As the mahoganies fall.’[p.121]
Little hope is then
seen for being alleviated from their helpless state.
This is underscored by the images of a drifting vessel.
Ogro therefore expresses bafflement as to where they
are: ‘Will anyone tell where we are?’ The problem is
not just one of finding their location but where exactly
were they're going, Olutu reveals. The second movement
of the play demonstrates that even though there might
be momentary breakthroughs, these are never lasting. A
storm approaches with its winds getting stronger and
stronger. But through Ogro’s resourcefulness, the raft
is released from the giddy spin of the dreadful
Osikoboro whirlpool. But this is only a momentary
triumph, showing that such successes are only isolated
streaks in a flow of misery and gloom. No sooner the
raft starts drifting again, to everyone’s delight and
relief than tragedy strikes. The very force that
liberated them turns its destructive force on the raft,
breaking it up and setting one of the crew adrift to an
unknown but devouring destination. The perceptive
Kengide concludes it with a revealing:
| We are all adrift and lost Ogrope, we
are all adrift and lost. [p112] |
The futility of any struggle is
suggested through this drifting course of the lumbermen.
Any effort to set
the raft on an even keel becomes futile. The characters
therefore remain bewildered about their position and
direction. The gloom is reinforced by the darkness of
the night. Worsening the situation are the hidden rays
from the moon and the stars – clearly suggestive of the
loss of hope. The only source of hope left is from an
alternative source of light, a lamp. But this only
creates a pale of light through which not even a dog
could see. Clark thus endorses the uninterrupted
continuity of man’s tragic destiny. Existence in such
circumstances is then tantamount to an unending struggle
with poverty and suffering, as suggested by Ogro.
|
Each day some fellow is either
Going out with a hiss or making his brief
Entrance with a howl, and the women wail
Going to bed and wake up wailing for their
seeds
Are eaten up by the
black beetle. [p113] |
The Raft
reads like ‘a series of anecdotes and local gossip
strung together’ as Dan Izevbaye states. However,
though the play seems episodic, a common thread runs
through the apparently unconnected anecdotes in the play
to form the synthesizing element piecing all the bits
together. This is the tragic view of life running
throughout the work reminding us of the dangerous drift
of man.
But the play lacks
striking and memorable characters. For no character
emerges individualized though Fergusson calls them
fairly well differentiated. Olutu, Ogro and Ibodo share
the same attribute – optimism. Kengide is the only one
to emerge distinctively. But then as Fergusson states,
there is no apparent connection between a character and
his particular misfortune.
Clark’s failure to
bring out the necessary contrasts n character and
situation results in little significant dialogue being
developed, though Fergusson states his fascination with
the apparent accuracy of the dialogue. The characters
talk alike and the dramatic situation remains
uneventful. There are no conflicts, no intrigues and no
twists in fortune – just one straight course. The
characters have too little action and the raft too
much. In addition, there are the technical difficulties
of staging involved: one is how the drifting raft with
its crew will be represented and how its movement and
statism could be suggested. Not surprisingly then, it
has remained for long unstaged.
Despite the claims
of critics to the contrary, the language of the play has
a kind of somber poetic wit and depth which could only
be slowly uncovered. And if it should be credited for
its evocation of life on the river and of Ijaw proverbs
and customs, as has often been the case, it should be
due to the evocative suggestiveness of its language.
* *
* * *
Sources
Clark J. P. The Raft in
Three Plays.
Egudu R.N ‘J.P. Clark’s The
Raft: The Tragedy of Economic Impotence,’ in World
Literature Written in English, Vol 15, No 2,
November1976, pp297-304.
Izevbaye Dan ‘The plays of John
Pepper Clark’ in English Studies in Africa, Vol.18 No1,
March, 1975, pp. 30-40.
Encyclopedia Wikepedia.
* *
* * *
posted 21 April 2007 |